Parents Afraid To Parent
Gentle parenting & expert culture has produced an epidemic of parents afraid of their children's emotions & reactions
"Oh my god, where is it? WHERE IS IT?!"
I watched in genuine disbelief as this parent frantically rummaged through an oversized bag, panic etched across her face.
The source of this emergency?
Her three-year-old had started fidgeting in an office waiting room, showing the first signs of potential boredom.
"HERE! LOOK! BLUEY!" she practically shouted with relief, thrusting an iPad inches from her toddler's face, the screen already glowing with the child's favorite show.
Crisis averted. Heaven forbid this child might experience thirty seconds of undirected attention in a waiting room.
You may not fully realize the implications of what we're seeing everywhere – it's become so normalized that the connection between today's parenting and tomorrow's dysfunction is almost invisible. Look around any restaurant, waiting room, or public space.
What do you see?
Parents frantically keeping their children perpetually entertained, as if five seconds of boredom might trigger some catastrophic meltdown. They're not just entertaining their kids – they're operating from a place of genuine fear about what their child's momentary discomfort might produce. God forbid a child might experience an unscheduled, unstructured moment where they'd have to regulate their own internal state.
What's the result of this perpetual pacification strategy?
An explosion of mental health diagnoses masquerading as medical conditions when they're actually the predictable outcome of never developing emotional muscles. Suddenly "everybody has ADHD" now. Then there's the anxiety disorders, depression, oppositional defiant disorder, emotional dysregulation, and a vocabulary of psychiatric labels that essentially translate to: "This child never learned to manage their internal states."
These kids haven't developed the discipline (and neural pathways) necessary for sustained attention because they've had dopamine-delivery devices in their hands since infancy. They haven't built the psychological infrastructure to process disappointment because they've rarely been allowed to experience it. They haven't learned that uncomfortable feelings are temporary and survivable because they've been rescued from even the slightest frustration. Instead, they're at the mercy of their emotions, controlled by them rather than learning to face them.
By the time they reach my office, these now teens and young adults don't just struggle with attention—they collapse at the first hint of challenge, catastrophize minor setbacks, rage when told "no," and lack the fundamental emotional tools that previous generations developed naturally through unstructured play, boredom, and yes, the experience of not always getting their way.
"I have ADHD, Depression, and Anxiety," they proclaim with an almost perverse pride, as if reciting medals of honor earned in the battlefield of modern existence. Each diagnosis arrives gift-wrapped as the perfect explanation for why life feels so unmanageable, why responsibilities are so overwhelming, why adulting is just too damn hard. They've fully embraced their identity as perpetual patients, hapless victims of misfiring neurotransmitters and faulty brain circuitry.
But I can't help but trace these issues back to what I've been witnessing for 25 years. These aren't medical conditions we're seeing—they're the predictable endpoint of a parenting culture that's gone terribly sideways. When you never allow a child to experience boredom, frustration, or disappointment, you systematically dismantle their ability to regulate their own emotional states. When you frantically intervene at the first hint of distress, you implicitly teach them that discomfort is emergency.
We've created a generation of parents who are literally afraid of their own children—afraid of their tantrums, their disappointment, their momentary unhappiness—and consequently, a generation of young adults who collapse at the first hint of discomfort, running to psychiatrists' offices for diagnoses that medicalize what is fundamentally a failure of emotional development. This magazine cover is from 2001… the problem was recognized then and it’s been downhill ever since.
Fear Based Parenting
The answer lies in the unholy alliance between fear-mongering media, the "expert" industrial complex, and a culture increasingly obsessed with pathologizing every human emotion.
"I'm just trying not to traumatize him," explained Melissa, mother of twelve-year-old Aiden, who hadn't heard the word "no" since infancy. "I read that enforcing boundaries can trigger anxiety and attachment issues. Every parenting expert warns about the long-term psychological damage that comes from children feeling unsafe. I don't want to be responsible for giving him lasting mental health problems."
There it was—the perfect encapsulation of modern parenting paralysis. This educated, well-meaning mother had been convinced that normal parental authority would psychologically damage her child. She'd absorbed countless articles, social media posts, and "gentle parenting" books that positioned any child's distress as evidence of parental failure.
I witnessed this same warped thinking with Deborah, mother of 15-year-old Emma. She came to my office in tears after confiscating her daughter's phone for lying about her whereabouts.
"Emma hasn't spoken to me in three days," Deborah confessed, her voice trembling as if describing a hostage situation rather than standard teenage dramatics. "She slams doors when I enter rooms and has informed me—via a devastatingly detailed text message—that I've 'literally ruined her entire life,' 'destroyed all trust forever,' and am 'worse than any parent in the history of parents.' I'm seriously concerned I've inflicted irreversible psychological damage. Last night I googled 'PTSD from phone confiscation' at 3 AM. What if she's right? Every social interaction her friend group has is happening in group chats and Instagram DMs she can't access. By Monday, they will have made weekend plans without her, shared private jokes she won't understand, and possibly even replaced her in their social hierarchy. I can't stop picturing her alone and ostracized because I've cut her off from her entire support network. Is enforcing a consequence for one lie really worth potentially destroying her social life forever?"
I stared at her in disbelief. "Let me get this straight. Your teenage daughter lied to you, you enforced a reasonable consequence, and now you think her completely predictable emotional reaction is trauma?"
"Well, yes," she responded defensively. "All the parenting accounts I follow talk about how teen brains are developing and how emotional rejection can cause lasting damage."
"Deborah," I said, "teenagers have been dramatically declaring their lives ruined by parents since the dawn of time. This isn't trauma—it's Tuesday in the life of an adolescent. By believing it's your job to prevent your daughter from experiencing any negative emotion, you're teaching her that she's too fragile to handle normal disappointment."
She looked genuinely confused. "But isn't it my job to make sure she feels secure and happy?"
"No," I replied. "It's your job to raise a human being who can function in a world that will frequently disappoint her. By rushing to remove consequences at the first sign of her displeasure, you're raising someone who will crumble when facing a boss, professor, or partner who doesn't immediately bend to her emotional state."
What Deborah and countless other parents don't realize is that they've been manipulated by a massive industry that profits from parental fear. Parenting "experts" don't gain followers by telling you your kids will probably turn out fine regardless if you fail to attend to every whim. Pediatric mental health providers don't build practices by reassuring parents that temper tantrums are developmentally appropriate and provide you clear strategies in just 1 session. Parenting book authors don't land on bestseller lists by suggesting that children are naturally resilient.
No, the entire apparatus depends on convincing you that your child is perpetually on the brink of psychological catastrophe, and only by following the latest expert recommendations (which, conveniently, contradict last year's expert recommendations) can you prevent irreparable damage.
The result? Parents are terrified of their own children’s emotional states. This is a MAJOR cultural shift that has lasting implications.
The Great Emotional Fragility Scam
Here's what nobody's telling them. Children need to experience negative emotions. They need to feel frustrated. They need to face disappointment. They need to hear "no." These aren't traumatic events to be avoided—they're the essential building blocks of emotional resilience.
Yet we've created a culture where parents believe their primary job is to prevent their child from ever feeling bad. This isn't just misguided—it's actively harmful. It's like trying to build stronger muscles by ensuring your child never lifts anything heavy.
The science on this couldn't be clearer. Resilience—that essential quality that allows humans to bounce back from adversity—literally cannot develop without exposure to manageable stress. This is called "stress inoculation" in the psychological literature, and it's as fundamental to emotional development as weight-bearing exercise is to bone density. Preventing a child from experiencing manageable stress doesn't protect them—it ensures they'll be psychologically fragile.
Throughout human history, children have faced far greater challenges than being told to wait their turn or hearing the word "no." Children survived wars, economic depressions, famines, and diseases. They worked on farms, helped raise siblings, and contributed to family survival from young ages. The idea that a child will be psychologically damaged by having to sit with uncomfortable feelings for five minutes isn't just ahistorical—it's laughably absurd.
Let's be brutally honest about what's really happening here. The myth of childhood emotional fragility isn't a scientific discovery—it's a marketing strategy. It's the perfect engine for a multi-billion dollar industry spanning pharmaceuticals, therapy, parenting books, coaching services, and educational accommodations. You don’t believe me? This is what you and your kids are exposed to on social media.
We're living through history's most effective PsyOp: the complete pathologization of normal human experience. Every uncomfortable emotion is now "trauma." Every challenge a "trigger." Every struggle evidence of disorder. This isn't accidental—it's engineered fragility… and parents have bought it.
Think about the beautiful circular logic at work:
Media & Parenting "Experts" CREATE FEAR in parents that children are psychologically fragile
↓
Fearful Parents PROTECT children from experiencing emotional challenges
↓
Children NEVER DEVELOP emotional regulation skills
↓
Children STRUGGLE in situations requiring emotional resilience
↓
Medical Establishment LABELS normal developmental struggles as disorders
↓
Doctors PRESCRIBE drugs & therapy for these "disorders"
↓
Parents BELIEVE diagnosis confirms child's fragility
↓
Parents become EVEN MORE PROTECTIVE, creating less resilient children
↓
(And the cycle continues...)
All of this centered around the MULTI BILLION PROFIT MACHINE that has every incentive to keep this wheel spinning generation after generation.
The pharmaceutical industry alone makes over $25 billion annually from antidepressants, and anti-anxiety drugs prescribed to children and adolescents. The therapy and mental health industry adds billions more. Have our children's emotional resilience fundamentally changed in a single generation? Or have we systematically stripped them of opportunities to develop resilience, then pathologized the predictable results?
Look at the absurdity of where we've landed: Schools have eliminated competitive games because some children might feel bad about losing. Parents intervene in every peer conflict, preventing children from learning conflict resolution. College students demand "trigger warnings" before encountering challenging ideas. Young adults enter the workforce unable to handle criticism without emotional collapse.
We've rebranded normal childhood emotional experiences as potential trauma. A child feeling sad becomes "depressive symptoms." A child feeling nervous becomes "anxiety disorder." A child struggling to sit still becomes "ADHD." Normal developmental phases are now medicalized conditions requiring professional intervention.
This is the cruel irony of modern fear-based parenting: In our desperate attempt to protect children from emotional discomfort, we're raising a generation completely unprepared to handle life's inevitable challenges. We're not preventing future therapy—we're guaranteeing it.
"But my child seems so fragile," parents tell me. "You should see how upset they get."
Of course they seem fragile. You've been treating them as fragile since birth. You've been implicitly telling them through your actions that negative emotions are emergencies. You've been teaching them they can't handle disappointment by swooping in to prevent it at every turn. You've been showing them they need rescue rather than resilience.
Children aren't naturally emotionally fragile—we've systematically trained them to be that way. Then we act surprised when they believe us.
From Healthy Struggle to Helplessness
Remember when kids spent hours trying to learn skills—riding bikes, building forts, mastering video games—without adult intervention? Remember when children organized their own games, resolved their own conflicts, and created their own entertainment?
That world is vanishing before our eyes. Today's parents hover anxiously, ready to step in at the first sign of frustration. "Let me help you" has replaced "Try again." "I'll do it for you" has supplanted "You can figure it out."
The result is children who give up at the first obstacle, who lack the confidence that comes from overcoming challenges, who believe they're incapable of solving their own problems.
"My son had a math test coming up and was getting really stressed about it," Mark told me during a session. "We called his doctor who wrote a note excusing him from the test because of 'anxiety.'"
"And what lesson did your son learn from that?" I asked.
Mark looked confused. "That we support his mental health?"
"No," I said. "He learned that difficult emotions are dangerous and should be avoided rather than worked through. He learned that the right response to challenge is retreat. He learned that he's too fragile to handle normal academic expectations."
The implications of this lesson extend far beyond a missed math test. Consider what happens when this pattern repeats throughout childhood. Each time a child is rescued from emotional discomfort, they're denied the opportunity to develop the neural pathways associated with resilience. They never experience the essential sequence of struggle → perseverance → mastery → confidence that builds psychological strength.
By college, these kids fall apart during finals week, unable to manage ordinary academic pressure. Professors report unprecedented levels of students seeking extensions, accommodations, and mental health exemptions for basic course requirements. Campus counseling centers are overwhelmed not by serious psychiatric conditions but by students experiencing normal stress responses they never learned to regulate.
By early adulthood, employers encounter job candidates who crumble at the first sign of constructive criticism. HR departments report increasing numbers of young employees who expect work to feel consistently comfortable and affirming. Many quit within months when faced with routine workplace challenges, convinced their anxiety is evidence they're in a "toxic environment" rather than experiencing normal professional growth pains.
The most devastating effect is what happens internally. These young adults develop a profound sense of their own fragility. They genuinely believe they lack the capacity to withstand discomfort. Anxiety, which everyone experiences, becomes catastrophized as evidence of disorder rather than recognized as a normal response to challenging situations. Small disappointments are experienced as overwhelming because they never developed the emotional muscles to metabolize failure.
Mark shifted uncomfortably in his chair. "But his doctor said his anxiety was real."
"Of course his anxiety was real," I replied. "Anxiety before tests is completely normal. It's not the presence of anxiety that's the problem—it's his relationship to that anxiety. By treating his normal emotional response as a medical condition requiring intervention, you've pathologized something that could have been a growth opportunity. You've denied him the chance to discover that he can feel anxious and still function, that discomfort can be tolerated, that challenges can be overcome rather than avoided."
The medical system eagerly collaborates in this madness, providing notes to excuse children from normal developmental challenges under the guise of "mental health." What they're actually doing is certifying these children's helplessness, providing official documentation of their supposed fragility that follows them throughout their educational journey.
The Courage To Parent
At the heart of this epidemic is a devastating loss of parental confidence. Parents no longer trust their instincts because they've been systematically undermined by an "expert" culture that positions them as potential damagers of their children's psyches.
The systematic destruction of parental confidence serves a market need, creating perpetually insecure consumers of parenting advice. It also creates something far more sinister: parents who are afraid to exercise authority.
When parents are convinced that saying "no" might traumatize their child, that enforcing bedtime might trigger anxiety, that insisting on chores might damage self-esteem—they abdicate their fundamental responsibility to prepare children for adulthood.
So what's the alternative to this madness? How do we raise children who can actually function in a world that doesn't cater to their every emotional state?
First, we need to recognize the resilience inherent in human development. Children aren't fragile vessels easily shattered by normal parental authority. They're adaptive organisms designed to learn from challenges.
The scientific evidence is overwhelmingly clear: resilience develops through gradually increasing challenges, not through protection from all distress. Research consistently shows that overprotective parenting is associated with increased anxiety, depression, and inability to cope with adversity.
What children actually need is not protection from all discomfort, but rather:
Clear, consistent boundaries that don't collapse at the first sign of protest
Gradually increasing responsibility appropriate to their developmental stage
The experience of working through frustration to mastery
The opportunity to fail in small ways and learn they can recover
Adults who model healthy emotional regulation rather than emotional avoidance
Most importantly, children need parents who aren't afraid of them—parents confident enough to withstand temporary emotional storms because they know the long-term benefits of developing self-discipline.
This doesn't mean returning to harsh, authoritarian parenting. It means finding the courage to say "This is hard, but I know you can handle it" instead of "Let me make sure you never experience anything difficult."
Derek, father of a twelve-year-old daughter, shared a breakthrough moment in our sessions.
"She wanted the newest iPhone. All her friends had them, apparently. When I said no, she unleashed this epic tantrum—screaming, crying, telling me I was ruining her life."
"What did you do?" I asked.
"For the first time, I just... stayed calm. I said 'I understand you're disappointed, but the answer is still no.' And then I walked away while she continued melting down."
"And what happened?"
"She stormed around for about twenty minutes, slammed her door a few times. But then, something amazing happened. She came out of her room, sat down next to me, and started telling me about this science project she was excited about. She just... moved on. It was like she tested the boundary, saw it was solid, and then felt secure enough to get back to normal life."
This is the moment many parents never experience because they're too afraid of their child's emotional reactions. They never discover that children actually become more secure, not less, when they encounter firm, loving boundaries.
The reality is that your child throwing a tantrum because you set a limit isn't evidence of your failure—it's evidence that you're doing your job. Your teenager being temporarily angry because you enforce a consequence isn't trauma—it's preparation for a world that will hold them accountable.
The courage to parent means recognizing that your job isn't to make your child happy in every moment. Your job is to raise a human being capable of handling an unpredictable world, managing their own emotions, and persisting through challenges.
If we're going to reverse this epidemic of parental fear, we need to start by recognizing the forces that profit from it. We need to become more skeptical of "experts" who pathologize normal childhood behavior. We need to question a medical system increasingly eager to diagnose and medicate children who simply haven't developed emotional regulation skills.
Most importantly, we need to reclaim confidence in the basic principles that have guided child development throughout human history: Children grow through gradually increasing challenges. They develop discipline by experiencing the natural consequences of their choices. They build confidence by overcoming obstacles, not by having obstacles removed.
Next time your child melts down because you set a reasonable limit, remind yourself: This isn't an emergency. This isn't trauma. This is your child learning that they can experience difficult emotions and survive. This is your child developing the emotional muscles they'll need for a lifetime.
Your job as a parent isn't to prevent all distress—it's to help your child develop the tools to handle inevitable distress. And sometimes, the most compassionate thing you can do is simply say "I know this is hard, but I believe you can handle it."
The greatest gift you can give your child isn't protection from all emotional discomfort. It's the unshakable belief in their capacity to face life's challenges and grow stronger through them.
Your child is far more resilient than you've been led to believe. They don't need to be protected from normal developmental challenges. They need to be guided through them by parents who aren't afraid to actually parent.
RESIST
I try to keep RADICALLY GENUINE as free as I can, but it takes quite a lot of work. If you find some value in my writing and podcast I very much appreciate the paid subscription. It really helps me continue putting time aside for these pieces. Thank you.
In my opinion, there's a real sweet spot we seem to be missing as parents, where we can still be compassionate and empathetic toward our kids' genuine emotional responses AND ALSO teach them that managing discomfort is a very normal and expected part of being human. A few weeks ago in my nine-year-old's parent teacher conference, his teacher mentioned that she had seen how upset my son was when he didn't get chosen to perform in the school's ukulele concert. "Sam's a kid who excels at a lot of things," she said. "It's good for him to practice managing disappointment and failure. I gave him a hug and told him it sucks that he didn't get picked, but sometimes people are just better than you at certain things." I was blown away by her response, which so perfectly mirrored my own to the same situation. To me, THIS is what we can do for our kids: show them compassion ("yeah, that really sucks") and also remind them that a) feelings are normal and b) they are perfectly equipped to survive them.
I work in the public school system. Most of us would agree with you. But a lot of these kids get “diagnosed” by doctors with ADHD , autism, generalized anxiety disorder, etc. by their pediatrician based solely on interviews with parents , who at the parents’demands write us letters requesting special education services or 504 accommodations, when the majority of kids in school these days have issues with socializing, persisting with academic tasks that require any attention or work, following directions, etc. Half the kids in our school ( I work in an elementary school) are in therapy for crying out loud and their therapists just agree that they have these disorders and we are all supposed to give them “accommodations” that just continue it. The medical establishment is part of the problem. We get more and more kids who aren’t toilet trained coming into kindergarten, etc etc. It’s crazy. How do we fix this?